
Extracted text · highlighting “Nancy Dutcher”
Rockridge News Sponsored by * THE ROCKRIDGE COMMUNITY PLANNING COUNCIL * 5856 COLLEGE AVENUE #130" OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA® 94618 Vol. 4 No. 6 Issue No. 40 October 14, 1989 Circulation: 4,500 Residences; 200 Businesses Exciting Start For RCPC Legal Fund Rockridge Neighbors responded enthusiastically to the initial call for donations to the legal fund established for the suit against the City, donating an impressive $6,000 in only 21 days, according to members of the fundrais- ing committee. Donating amounts from $10 to $500, residents are showing their displeasure with the City’s handling of the Dreyer’s project approval. Have you made your donation yet? Please use the enclosed return enve- lope to do so now. Your Atti ort is critical! S YS “, S$20, 000 = Be = Will Neighbors Help Pay For A New Rockridge Library? by Andy Young & Nancy Dutcher Anyone who ventures into the tem- porary Rockridge Library on the Clare- mont Middle School campus becomes aware quickly of its limitations — small size, limited book collections, and cramped stack and reading space. It’s obvious we need a permanent Rock- ridge Library. The only question is: How do we get it? City WANTS BRANCH ESTABLISHED The City of Oakland and the Oakland Library Department want to establish a The project has cleared several major hurdles, but others remain. For example, it is not clear how long it will take to fund the project nor even that funding can be found. A critical period lies ahead. Although the City has committed substantial funds to site allocation, fur- nishing and staffing the library, the bulk of the construction costs will have to come from other sources. PROPOSITION 85 FUNDING SOURCE? One of these sources may be Propo- sition 85, a state bond permanent branch library in the Rockridge commu- nity. Both have commit- ted substantial resources to the project. Using Off- Look inside for your copy of the Rockridge Library survey! measure passed in No- vember, 1988 which provides funds for con- struction and improve- ment of local libraries. Street Parking Commis- sion funds, the City has acquired the Art Stone property on Col- lege Avenue near Manila for a site for the library, and is acting to acquire the adjacent corner property. The Library The Library Department is energetically pursuing this promising new source of funding. To qualify for See Library, page 3 $14,000 Department has spent considerable time RCPC Meeting Change $12,000 drawing up a program for the proposed library. $10,000 See you at the : FINDING FUNDING Series! - $8,000 For the last two years, the RCPC The RCPC ‘opr raa | pee 067.00! 56 000 Library Committee has been working General Meeting Soe ees with the Library department and the is postponed to E : $4,000 City to explore funding sources, as well Wednesday, S is as to determine what the community October 25, ees wants in a new library. 7:30 PM. 9/16/89 $280.00 Start Dates Calendar Events Calendar Dates Tuesday Oct17 = 7:30 PM City Council Rescheduled: World Series. Check with City Clerk for day and time. Wednesday Oct25* 7:30PM RCPC General Meeting *(Rescheduled from October 18) College Avenue Presbyterian Church, 5951 College Avenue. BART, By-Laws, RASP, more. Thursday Oct30 7:30PM RCPC Board Meeting Claremont House, 4500 Gilbert. Wednesday Nov1S 7:30PM RCPC General Meeting College Avenue Presbyterian Church, 5951 College Avenue Page 2 The Rockridge News October 14, 1989 Brooklyn N’hood Challenges City, Wins Reversal by Valerie Winemiller Piedmont Avenue Neighborhood Improvement League Ina highly unusual move, the Oakland City Council voted Tuesday, September 19 to rescind a Major Variance it had previously granted for a fourteen unit apartment building at 1445 Sth Avenue. The Council’s action may lead to a resolution of the lawsuit filed by the Brooklyn Neighborhood Preservation Association (BNPA), alleging that the Council granted the variance despite the absence of the required legal findings. The vote is seen as a major victory for the city’s neighborhoods, who have been demanding zoning code enforcement. During debate, Councilmember Dick Spees referred to the issue as a “water- shed decision” on whether the Council will start enforcing its own zoning codes. In its report on the project, planning staff found no justification to approve the variance. The Planning Commission voted to deny the variance. Mr. Dang appealed the Commission’s denial to the City Council which over- turned the Commission’s decision. Coun- cilmembers Mary Moore, Wilson Riles, Jr., and Dick Spees opposed the Council action. BNPA filed suit, contending that the Council had acted without establishing the legal grounds required for such a variance. A number of other neighbor- hood organizations concerned about a pattern of similar Council decisions sup- ported BNPA’s decision to sue. BNPA was represented by attorney Linda Bytof, of the firm of McTernan, Stender and Walsh, who successfully sued the city in 1985 to reverse approval of a Popeye’s Fried Chicken franchise on Telegraph Avenue in her own neigh- borhood. That action resulted in impor- tant changes in the City’s notification procedures in zoning matters. of the MacArthur Metro Storage Space Available in garage... Claremont-Rockridge area. Call 547-8070. (Not suitable for automobiles.) RASP Funding Jeopardized CD Renounces $22,383 Grant City Council to Vote Nov. 7th by Barbara B. Anderson, RCPC Chair At its September 26, 1989 meeting, the City Council postponed voting on approval of a contract between RCPC and the Office of Community Develop- ment to provide $22,383 for develop- ment of a draft Rockridge Area Specific Plan (RASP). The Council put off the vote to allow for further discussion about the funding and the community planning process. The Council’s final vote on the grant is scheduled for its November 7, 1989 meeting, 7:30 pm. The City Council had approved two Community Development Block Grants to RCPC in 1988. The first grant, in the amount of $8,500, was used to complete Phase One of RASP: the Community “Consensus Building Project.” RCPC completed its contractual goals and objectives with the publication of a detailed written report in March 1989. The report identifies community goals drafted with findings from four Rock- ridge community forums held in the fall of 1988. It has been cited as a model for other neighborhood planning efforts. A second grant to RCPC of $22,383 (50% of the requested amount) was approved in 1988 as part of the City’s Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Fourteenth Year Block Grant Funds. The second grant would fund Phase II of the Specific Plan (RASP). The funds would enable the neighborhood to hire consultants to assist in developing a draft plan. The document would be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and comment by planners and the commu- nity. The contractual agreement for the second grant had already been prepared for approval by the City Council when, unexpectedly, the North Oakland Com- munity Development Committee (NOCDC) decided to reconsider the grant. At the end of July, the NOCDC recommended that the City rescind the RCPC grant and reprogram the funds to other North Oakland projects. Why did the NOCDC board change their minds about the RCPC grant? Since a variety of different explanations has been offered by the NOCDC over the past four months, the real reason is still unclear, or perhaps, still unstated. Originally, NOCDC’s stated con- cern was a routine audit of RCPC print- ing and publications expenditures of 1986 and 1987. By July, the auditor reported that RCPC was in compliance with Federal and State non-profit law. The NOCDC then shifted its position, questioning RCPC’s right to apply for HUD funds. In response, the CD staff stated that RCPC met all eligibility criteria and that the funds are earmarked for planning activities. In September, when it became clear that the grant approval was being challenged by sev- eral disgruntled zoning applicants and non-Rockridge residents, NOCDC brought up the question of whether RCPC should get the funds from some other source. RCPC has researched the availabil- ity of other funding for RASP. The requested amount of $22,383 is not available either in grant money or in equivalent staff time and materials, from the Oakland City Planning depart- ment budget, nor from the Oakland Metropolitan Forum, nor from the Neighborhood Commercial Revitaliza- tion (NCR) program. Our survey sug- gests that the entire RASP neighbor- hood planning process more likely than not will come to a sudden halt if the Council cuts off the CDBG funds. The NOCDC and individual critics have charged that RCPC is not suffi- ciently representative of the community for it to be able to conduct an open and public process. However, in Phase I, RCPC often stressed that the RASP process is open to all interested persons (not just Rockridge residents). In fact, several of the individuals who have spoken in opposition to the grant par- ticipated actively in the Community Forums and have signed up to be on RASP working committees. As soon as we are funded, all of us can get to work! Interested Neighbors are encour- aged to attend the November 7 City Council meeting. October 14, 1989 The Rockridge News Page 3 Library from page 1 Proposition 85 funds, however, a sub- Stantial commitment of local funds is required as well as a showing of local support for the proposed project. The funds Oakland has already committed to the new library should be viewed favorably by the State. Nonetheless, it is far from certain that this alone will result in an adequate grant to build the library. COMMUNITY Support CRITICAL To help demonstrate solid commu- nity support for the project, and to help raise the necessary additional funding, RCPC is working to create a special assessment district through the Mello- Roos Act, which allows local govern- ments to create special assessment dis- tricts to fund civic improvements when certain conditions are met. The Mello- Roos Act requires community input. Also, a two-thirds vote of the voters in the proposed assessment district would be required before any assessment could be enacted. In addition, boundaries of the assessment district must be clearly defined. RCPC believes that Rockridge resi- dents would support a reasonable as- sessment to help build a local library, and that creation of an assessment dis- trict would provide key funding, as well as greatly increasing the likelihood of securing Proposition 85 funds. PETITIONING THE CITY RCPC has made a tentative decision to petition the Oakland City Council to create a library assessment district that would encompass at least the RCPC membership area. This district would assess residential parcels at no more than $25 per year, with a lower rate for apartment units, and either no assess- ment or a reduced assessment rate for commercial properties. Wuo WouLp BE INCLUDED? The RCPC membership area con- tains approximately 3600 parcels that would be subject to assessment. In addition, the Upper Rockridge area, above Broadway but below Highway 13 and Florence Terrace, is an area outside the established RCPC membership area, but would be served by the new, larger RCPC Looks At By-Laws And Election Changes Committee Proposes Election Changes by John Steuart Changes in the procedures by which RCPC board members are elected have been recommended by a special com- mittee set up at last month’s RCPC general membership meeting. The committee unanimously recom- mended moving the annual election meeting to February; providing an alter- nate voting time on the Saturday before the annual meeting; holding a candi- date’s forum during the preceding week; and eliminating proxy voting. “The RCPC has outgrown its old election procedures,” commented com- mittee member Nina Robinson. The proposed changes aim at increasing the opportunity for night shift workers, parents of small children, and others to vote in the election. The changes are also intended to expand voter awareness of the candidates and their positions. In addition to its formal recommen- dations, the group supported the idea of expanding the coverage of candidate’s views in The Rockridge News. The committee recommendations were presented to the RCPC Board in early October. Rockridge Library. This Upper Rock- ridge area contains over 1400 parcels, and could provide significant support if included in an assessment district, while perhaps reducing the amount charged yearly to each parcel. Before undertaking a petition drive and starting an election campaign, RCPC wants to know if there is commu- nity support for such a district. Voice Your OPINION Enclosed in this issue of the Rock- ridge News is a survey to determine support for an assessment district. Please complete and return it as soon as possible. As it is most important to de- termine the support of the Upper Rock- ridge area, this issue of the News and the survey are also being distributed to homes there. RCPC thinks the new Rockridge Amendments To RCPC By-Laws Considered Changes to streamline voting proce- dures and clarify some areas of RCPC eligibility for membership were dis- cussed at the RCPC general meeting in September. A change in voting procedures, endorsed by the Board of Directors, would eliminate voting by proxy. Neighbors at the September meeting agreed with the board’s view that prox- ies involve too many technical prob- lems, and should be abolished. Neigh- bors also felt that some other voting procedure should be available for those who are unable to attend the annual election meeting. A special committee was established to discuss election pro- cedures and to suggest other changes. The following Neighbors volunteered for the committee: John Steuart, Chair; Nina Robinson; Ronnie Polonsky; Kathy Herman; Bob Macklin; Enrico Reguzzoni; and John Gussman. The committeepresented recommendations for changes to the board at its October meeting (see adjacent article). The board approved the recommendations, and they will be submitted to the gen- eral membership at the October 25th meeting. RCPC membership eligibility was clarified when Neighbors at the Sep- tember meeting favored an amendment to the by-laws stating that only natural persons (i.e€., not corporations) can be members. Other possible by-law changes discussed at the meeting con- cerned the boundary line at Clarke and Sist Street and deletion of a portion of the membership area which now techni- cally includes a portion of Berkeley. The board has invited further com- ment on these proposals. Library is a worthy project. It also thinks that a $25 annual assessment per residential property is not unreasonable for a branch library that will have community meeting facilities and park- ing. Creating the assessment district may well determine if the new Library becomes a reality. Speak out! Send in your survey. Page 4 The Rockridge News October 14, 1989 SS ACELAND/P1zzA RUSTICA 5299 COLLEGE AVENUE (CMD 89-339) The Planning Commission approved the Design Review application to add a second dome at the rear of the building. The Major Conditional use permit for a pizza restaurant was also approved. Fifteen conditions recommended by planning department staff and RCPC were adopted with a few minor changes. Key conditions for the restaurant relate to litter control, exterior lighting, landscaping, hours of operation (7 AM to midnight), odor control, loading and parking. The applicant will be required to have a joint parking agreement with the tenants of the off-street parking lot already on the property that will permit the lot to remain open and available to the restaurant after 5 pM. The Planning Commission decision is final unless appealed to the City Council. MEDICAL INSURANCE EXCHANGE OF CALIFORNIA (MIEC) 6250 CLAREMONT AVENUE (ER 89-42/CMD 89-317) A new office building and parking garage is proposed for the open parking lot currently between the existing Blood Bank building and the MIEC building. MIEC proposes to construct a 30,000 square foot, 3 story (5 level) office/ parking garage addition to its existing office building at 6250 Claremont Avenue. The addition would be located on the 8,771 square foot site between the MIEC office building and the Blood Bank. Results of an Initial Study required by the California Environmental Qual- ity Act (CEQA) and prepared by the Planning Department call for prepara- tion of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) by MIEC. The applicant will Piedmont Avenue Neighborhood Improvement League presents: Pictures of Neighborhood History a slide talk by historian and author Ted Wurm Thursday, November 9 7:00 pm, Social; 7:30 pm Program Tickets $3.50 at the door or in advance. 653-4552 St. Leo's School Auditorium 4238 Howe Street select an EIR consultant from the city’s list of approved consultants. An early step in the EIR process — called “scoping” — determines areas of concern such as parking, traffic pat- terns, noise and other potential project impacts that should be included in the EIR. RCPC has asked to be included in the initial scoping meetings. Neighbors in the adjacent residential area have participated in RCPC zoning committee discussions with MIEC representatives. More detailed information on the timetable for the proposed development is available from Mr. Charlie Bryant, City Environmental Officer at 273- 3941, tate state's es a ata ee a alla a al AAAS AAS eo ARR ARAN RA EAN A ee ee OO Oe etn at ete stat atete ste stele ete Wee eee ee ee ep ew © 6 ee 6 8 UP 66 6 8 ee ee ee eee eee ee eee es a aia Sauet — RCPC Committee List fi Peewee ww wee Listed below are standing committees of the Rockridge Community Planning Council with their respective Chairs and Co-Chairs. Please call any of the individuals listed if you have questions or problems with what's going on: COMMITTEE Cuatr/Co-CHAIRS CLEAN RockripGeE Gity Baxter 652-8419 Desicn REVIEW Glen Jarvis 654-5953 LIBRARY Marc Beyeler 654-6787 Nancy Dutcher 653-6018 RASP Andréa Walhof 420-1593 Rocxripce News Don Kinkead 655-7474 TRAFFIC Bill Manley 658-2419 David Reinke 653-5312 ZONING John Gussman 655-8817 Brooke Levin 653-7522 ADVOCATES 437 Alcatraz Avenue, Oakland CA 94609 WHY PAY 6% To SELL Your Home? Even 5% is unnecessary, because in most cases, REALTY ADVOCATES CHARGES ONLY 4% and provides the same full service as the higher priced companies. All our listings go in the Multiple Listing Service (MLS), and we hold Open Houses, broker's tours, advertise, and most importantly, vigorously advocate our client's best interests. Call for a copy of our informational brochure. We are also happy to provide a free written estimate of your home's value in today's market. call 428- O/O7 600 = REALTY 7 October 14, 1989 The Rockridge News Page 5 BART Eyes Rockridge Station Planning, Development Options by Sue Hone BART Director District 3 As you may know, BART is consid- ering various improvements to the Rockridge Station. We believe that the ideas we are working on are responsive to the results of last year’s RCPC survey, and the more recent RCPC goal and objectives statement. We hope that the work we are planning to do at the sta- tion will enhance the neighbor- hood while addressing the needs of our patrons. BART staff and I will be at the October RCPC meeting to share with the community our current thoughts on possible | station improvements, and to hear the neighborhood’s | views. PATRON PARKING BART needs to provide more patron parking. I hear this from patrons all the time. I also hear from Rockridge residents tired of competing with BART patrons for street parking. More patron parking could be provided by con- structing another parking deck at the station. Another possi- bility is better control of our lots to make sure patrons are not being crowded out by non- patron parkers. I want to ex- plore both possibilities. Charging a fee for parking might be one way of controlling the use of our lots. BART ANnp COLLEGE AVENUE I have also been asked to see what BART could do to “liven-up” our Col- lege Avenue frontage under the station and freeway. Some sort of reasonable- scale development might bring more light, more color and more life to this gap in the rich fabric of College Ave- nue. This is an idea well worth pursuing. BART ANnpD HousING I am also interested in the idea of buffering the interface of BART parking and the | neighborhood. Maybe there are some land uses that could soften the line between the BART facilities and surround- | ing homes. Low-rise apart- ments might serve this purpose. EIR ALTERNATIVES Listed in the table at left are the alternatives BART pro- poses to study as part of the en- vironmental impact assessment we plan to start this winter. The assessment process will | provide ample continuing op- portunities for the community to help shape our plans, and it will precede BART’s commit- ment to build anything. Our Rockridge neighbors must have plenty of thoughts to share with BART on _ these proposals. We have had one very pro- ductive meeting with the Rock- ridge Area Specific Plan Steer- ing Committee, and I look for- ward to participating in the October General Meeting. BART Meets With RASP Committee: Station Development BART is currently in the process of determining the future of the Rockridge station. Questions being asked are: Do we need more parking? How much is appropriate? Should we open the site to commercial development and other services? If these things are to be added, where precisely on the site should they be located? BART has stated its support for Rockridge community participation in station planning decisions and in recent weeks has met several times with the RCPC Area Specific Plan (RASP) committee and Rockridge residents who expressed interest during the RASP Community Forums held early this year. During these meetings, RASP committee members and BART staff (along with Director Sue Hone) talked about proposals for the site such as a child-care center, a library, small shops and housing. Though there has been some support for more parking, concerns over increased traffic and the high cost of parking additions were also noted. Other alternatives suggested to solve BART parking problems were monitoring Station usage with a token or coin system such as the system Operating at the Lafayette station, or simply providing spaces at a price the market will bear, and opening the spaces to whoever is willing to pay the price. Another option suggested is carpool spaces. These subjects will be discussed in depth See BART, page 6 October 14, 1989 The Rockridge News Liz Maxwell: Rockridge Painter citiietiteaciebaineion Rockridge painter Liz Maxwell, born in West Point, New York, has alternated her art with employment as a mathemati- cian and statistician for several years. Now “semi-retired” from statistics, she teaches math part-time so she can paint more. Liz has been involved with art ever since high school but got away from it for awhile to raise a family and work in statistics. In 1976, she went back to art classes at CCAC and U. C. Berkeley. Since leaving full-time work for painting, she has been showing her work in Oakland and in San Francisco as often as walls are available for exhibition. Liz’ paintings were recently hanging at the Edible Complex on College Avenue and at West Wind in Berkeley. Rockridge Café will feature her work in December. Liz opens her Rockridge studio during the annual ProArts tour program. “I’ve been participating in ProArts Open Studios every | year and will do that again in °89,” she Says. In My View... Comments by Marge Gibson-Haskell City Council, District 1 City Council Begins New Budget Process The City Council budget process is not a sexy topic that inspires people to get out and rally for a cause, but it is supremely important to the Rockridge neighborhood. I am writing about it because as a result of the passage of the full- time Mayor Charter amendment, the Mayor and Council are beginning to design new processes for budget development. CITIZENS’ BupGET CoMMITTEE In the old days, the only requirements were that the City Manager had to present to the Council a proposed budget by June 1 which had to be passed by June 30. Now, the Council-Mayor process has become a year-long one with the support of a Citizens’ Budget Committee, which is chaired by Randy Hamilton from North Oakland and also has Rockridge Neighbor Theresa Nelson as an able mem- ber. I hope that they can both make presentations to the community as the process moves on. BuDGET TIMING The timing as proposed at the Council retreat in Septem- ber calls for a general statement of priorities to be presented to the Council and community by the Mayor in November. This will be commented upon by the Council with recom- mendations from the community at that time. Later, proba- bly early in January, the Mayor will present a State of the City address outlining his priorities. The Council will then commence departmental review and public review which will continue until the budget is adopted. The result of this process will b e to permit more public input at various points of consideration. Your attention to the process is hereby requested and I hope you will express your concerns to me in a timely way. Let Me Hear From You If you wish to comment on the budget or the process, please call me or my assistant Bill Lowe at 273-3266. i Miles Davis At The Paramount © Liz Maxwell ——_____—_ a ——_—_—$_—<_$_—<_—_—_——$——<—< Weather, Litter Threaten A Clean Rockridge GUTTERS Fall is here again and that means it’s time to sweep up the leaves, twigs, and other natural detritus that collect in our gutters during the summer. Those streets visited regularly by the City’s sweeper will have less to worry about but it’s something we all should pay attention to. Utitity PoLes P.G. & E. poles have become targets of commercial adver- tising. Rampant posting on the poles makes the neighborhood look littered. Help remove commercial advertising by taking it down from poles near your home or business. This includes out of date garage sale and other signs, too. COLLEGE AVENUE With its ever-increasing auto and pedestrian traffic, Col- lege Avenue is getting to be more and more littered. Let’s watch for and pick up litter. The Merchants Association has arranged for additional trash cans on parts of the Avenue. Let’s use them! BART from page 5 at the October 25th RCPC General Meeting. Director Hone and BART staff have been invited to present existing propos- als and solicit input from the community at large. If you're interested in the future of the BART Station, come to the meeting and let your views be heard! October 14, 1989 te ee Diversify The Board EDITOR: The September issue of the Rock- ridge News indicated an opening for the RCPC board of directors. The vacant seat should go to someone sensitive to the viewpoints of renters, students, low- income residents, minorities and other underrepresented groups in Rockridge. Increasingly, those harboring feel- ings of underrepresentation have been actively speaking out against the cur- rent RCPC Board. Dozens of commu- nity members attended the last City scien 2 re Fe A FINE JEWELRY DESIGN Distinctive Jewelry, Impeccably Handcrafted In Our Shop Custom Designing ¢ Wedding Sets Fine Diamonds ¢ Colored Gemstones Estate Jewelry ¢ Appraisals ¢ Repairs 5482 College Ave., Oakland (Near Rockridge Bart) The Rockridge News —_ ee ae T —s = ee cee ee —— Se a Se ee ee = see — = A an aston Council meeting voicing the concern that the current RCPC is a narrow group which does not reflect the diversity of Rockridge. Within the past few months, two advisory committees overwhelm- ingly voted to withdraw grant funds pre- viously allocated to the RCPC due to public outcry against the current RCPC leadership and behavior. In addition, a government unit audited the RCPC’s finances. | Although the investigation closed without citing the RCPC for any impro- prieties, many neighbors are concerned BUMP YY SIO. re —s) . o> ‘Ay 4 ; OPS y 4 - . m 7 ~ % wn uth Sy Tm Dr nkgoy aN» «= Ps -. ’ ° — « ' i. » Area Sizes to Room Sizes ARMEN GALLERY Oriental Rugs & Kilims Discover the Traditional Art of the Persian Weavers Ferahan Sarouk 3! 3x52" c. 1880 Open: Tues.- Sun. 11-6 pm e 6015 College Ave. ° Oakland ¢ 655-0167 °¢ i eee - —_ — - _ ee tee _—— -- - he News ee eee ee about the current Board’s judgment and lack of diversity. My experience as a former director of Over 21, Inc., a large nonprofit provider of educational serv- ices for the severely developmentally disabled, has taught me that nonprofit organizations must be diverse, tolerant, and ethical to succeed. To break the cycle of mistrust, the current board should act quickly to appoint a fresh viewpoint to the board. In the January board election, a coalition of four opposition candidates to the current board received over 230 live and absentee votes — approxi- mately 46% of the votes cast. If the current board were smart, it would reach out to the other 46% of the community and offer the empty board seat to one of the opposition candidates. I have great hopes that the RCPC may some day become an organization that everyone in Rockridge can respect. One must ask the question out loud whether the current RCPC is serious about bringing all of the viewpoints in this community under one roof. I con- tinue to work with the RCPC on its RASP steering committee and several other committees in an attempt to bring about a more open and responsive or- ganization. If you, too, share my concerns, please call me at 655-6071. — John Steuart RCPC Board Response At the recent City Council hearing on the RASP grant, the only resident of Rockridge who spoke against RCPC was John Steuart. The other six opposition speakers included three members of the North Oakland Community Development See Reply, page 8 Attention! —" Looking For A Barber? Dolores Uribe is looking for you... Formerly of the Elmwood Barber Shop, Dolores is now at Make Waves Hair Salon 5400 Manila off College Avenue (across from Hudson Bay Caffe) Walk-ins welcome 653-3904. eerie Page 8 The Rockridge News October 14, 1989 Reply, from page 7 Council; two well-known opponents of residential permit parking; and John Allen, developer of “Aceland” and co- founder of the Oakland Development Council. We think we > understand the other speaker’s reasons for opposing the grant; r but we are puzzled by Mr. Steuart’s appearance in opposition to the grant, given his membership on the RASP steering com- Oy oe | = se At the last RCPC election, the vote tabulators found that the y So Donvicinnic proxy (absentee) votes were too few to affect the election : URBAN PROVISIONS = outcome. Representatives of the two slates then agreed that all See zs ————___— proxies should be placed under seal. The tabulators never | / , ° ee reached the question of which proxies (if any) were valid. | Movie Special! - Also, proxies were filed on behalf of both slates — not just for | ee Se movies for the price of 1 | = the challengers, as Mr. Steuart assumes. Thus, Mr. Steuart’s | | Rent 2 p 2 ee +500 8 tw we a “unofficial” election results must be taken with a grain of salt. | | OF the month of October, when | ~ | you rent any New Release, we'll | | tenes ee throw in another at no charge. | Come On Down... a eee ae me ss rr a i oc i a ae ae | i ee i Te ne we a be) eee ee le es Se Rm ee oe a eg te ” ee ee eS ee Se ey thee eee ee OS Ue See ee oe ow e's s*s4 “eaten teeeee tee eee € New Sunday Hours! p oe J “ss. 8 enue “eee etme || 7AMtoMidnight Monday-Friday es eee _eeues ‘-* ‘eee 4 9AMtoMidnight Saturday sae se “eee e tease The Full Service Copy Center 9AMto9PM Sunday |. see se ee ae “ee ee 4 5642 College Avenue At Rockridge BART} | +e ee DESKTOP PUBLISHING MAC /1BM / Laser Printing *paeee eae ee 428-9256 “ss sa eee ee pear “1e¢eue -* 2s ee Specials good with this ad only. One coupon per customer! | |: toe seaee household. Expires in 30 days unless otherwise stated, This ad ge eer ewe ++ #8 & “eeeee supersedes all others. Prices subject to change without notice, | /o°*: see weevteen FAX & TELEX SERVICES Berkeley Refupee... * HIGH QUALITY COPIES +* COMPUTER CLASSES * LASER COPYING & CONSULTING * BINDERY SERVICES * COMPUTER/GRAPHIC ‘ . . ~~ . “** * ‘ee enewnne -< ae * - - . a ’ — a . . “* .* oseeewe . a ‘ a . . vee . ove . . . .« oa eae “«* . . . see. . “et eee ee F «8 ee ee ae a ee «> > Fs babi F BB © 8 we . eee ee i ee ee a Oe ee, ee ee « os . “ . ss ** . . ** 7% ** . ose esnenee os © . ss = * ~ . “ene - BUSINESS CARDS & DESIGN house downpayment) 32 year old professional. © STATIONERY * WORD PROCESSING ee ae ees ee eee eee es . . ~ ‘=. a"e's ° a + + . . “7 oe seeeue i _ . esetevreeeuepaneae * een e eu ee err er aes . - * . 3 . . oweuwruseae eee *e ee eee ee ee ° oo. 2S. +s . .* . 2s s en 6 eh ‘ . . x “*¢ . “eas . «+ . w* ee ee ee *."a"e sc eo. bs . a) «os ‘ ~_s ee -* ~~ “eee epee es eee eee * ewe ee ee a's are . “+ . . ~~ * oe ~eeee "seen e es ® “eee 7 r ‘ . “? 7 “*ve a -« " esuee eee ae ae <2 4 8 eee 7 - . ww . seuss ves - * . sees * UPS SHIPMENTS * BUSINESS, OFFICE & * PRIVATE MAIL BOXES COMPUTER SUPPLIES 654-6504 5856 College Avenue M-Th 8am-9pm Oakland, CA 94618 Fri 8am-8pm (1 Block to Rockridge BART) Sat 9am-7pm FAX: 415-654-1133 Sun 10am-6pm OPEN 7 DAYS A WEEK Claremont Day Nurseries 7 offers a high-quality exciting program for children 2 yrs. thru 6 yrs. at an affordable price. $396 full-time tuition (nourishing hot lunch incl.) 7am —-—6pm * emphasis on science and art * classes available in dance and language * professional and caring staff * serving the community for over 30 years * 3 convenient locations: 9803 College 2845 Woolsey St. 1550 Oakview Ave. Oakland Berkeley Kensington 658-5208 654-2511 526-1010 | See —_—_~ The Rockridge News is published monthly in Oakland except in | August and is sponsored by The Rockridge Community Planning Council. Got something planned you'd like to have The Rockridge News tell | about? Call Don Kinkead at 655-7474 or write to 5626 Oak Grove Avenue, Oakland 94618 (of course!) and let us know. @ November issue deadline is November 8th. FEATURING GRAFFEO COFFEES 5405 College Ave ¢ Oakland ® 558-9622 Open M-F 8-6 « Sat & Sun 8-4 <—>-~ a " . ee UU o ae